New Government policy could affect Arundel A27 bypass

New Government policy announced yesterday could affect an A27 bypass at Arundel.

The A27 at Arundel has long been a controversial topic. Picture: Derek Martin
The A27 at Arundel has long been a controversial topic. Picture: Derek Martin

Draft policy text for the Government’s national planning policy was published yesterday and includes guidance on building over ancient woodland.

All three bypass options for Arundel – including the ‘online’ solution – go through ancient woodland.

Sign up to our daily SussexWorld Today newsletter

The three routes for possible A27 improvement at Arundel. Picture: Highways England

The wording, which will be put up for consultation, was released on behalf of the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.

It says: “Development resulting in the loss or deterioration of irreplaceable habitats (such as ancient woodland) should be refused, unless there are wholly exceptional reasons and a suitable mitigation strategy exists.

“Where development would involve the loss of individual aged or veteran trees that lie outside ancient

woodland, it should be refused unless the need for, and benefits of, development in that location would clearly outweigh the loss.”

The key here will be if Highways England is able to demonstrate any Arundel A27 solution satisfies the ‘wholly exceptional reasons’ and ‘suitable mitigation strategy’ criteria.

Beccy Speight, chief executive of the Woodland Trust, said: “At last! The Government’s decision to amend planning policy to robustly – finally – protect ancient woodland is great news, and not before time.

“The proposed change will make the words on ancient woodland protection contained in the recent 25 year plan for the environment a reality.

“Our natural heritage and our wildlife have been sold off too cheaply and easily in the past and we’re delighted to see the Government is waking up to this and taking action.”

Nick Herbert, MP for Arundel and South Downs, said: “The draft policy makes it clear that nationally significant infrastructure such as the Arundel bypass can go ahead even at the cost of some woodland, provided the benefit outweighs the loss and there is mitigation.

“I am confident that an offline bypass will be approved because it is so clearly needed. The environment is currently being damaged by congestion at Arundel which causes rat-running through the historic town and the South Downs National Park”.

What do you think of the news? Email [email protected] or comment on our Facebook posts.

Want to join the A27 discussion? Join our Future of the A27 Facebook group.