Anger as CPS drop theft charge

LAST week's letter about the case of Chief Inspector Rowe does not go far enough (A 'disgraceful abdication', Herald December 4).
By The Newsroom
Published 11th Dec 2008, 16:37 BST
Updated 7th Jun 2018, 23:43 BST

When Alastair Nisbet, a senior prosecutor for the CPS, says "the police provided enough evidence to charge Mrs Rowe with stealing from Marks & Spencers' in October", then states "it is not in the public interest to prosecute her", something has gone seriously wrong with our legal system.

How, if there is sufficient evidence to show a prima facia case against Mrs Rowe, can it possibly not be in the public interest to prosecute her?

Surely it's the opposite that applies!

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

If, as Mr Nisbet suggests, there is sufficient evidence, then in view of her position she must be charged.

Mention has been made of her previous good character and the likely sentence.

Well, in my experience police officers convicted of such offences normally receive a custodial sentence.

If, on the other hand, there is insufficient evidence, then Mr Nisbet should publically withdraw his comment and apologise to Mrs Rowe.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

What ever the outcome, Alastair Nisbet should resign his position as he has brought the CPS into disrepute either way.

Bruce Spottiswoode

Southwick

NOTE: All letters must include a name and address which can be withheld by request.

-------------------------------------

Click here to go back to readers' letters.

Where are you? Add your pin to the Herald's international readers' map by clicking here.

Email the Herald: [email protected]

Want to read this page in French, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Urdu or 48 other languages? click here for Google translate.

Related topics:Google