‘Stay Alert’ guidance ‘much less clear’ than ‘Stay Home’

Letter from: Peter Lansley, Cedar Drive, Chichester
Stay Alert messageStay Alert message
Stay Alert message

I much enjoyed reading Katy Sherman’s article ‘Why grazing can be amazing for conservation’ (Observer, May 7) until I read her closing words: “So if you are out and about getting your daily exercise in the South Downs National Park watch out for our helpful grazing friends.”

I take my helpful daily exercise by ‘grazing’ at home and walking alone in my immediate local neighbourhood.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

On the same page Richard Williamson describes being kept company in solitary isolation by a blackbird with a ‘fruity warble’.

People with gardens or within easy walking distance of open spaces are, of course, very lucky.

Chichester Observer reporter Sam Dixon-French reminds West Sussex motorists to ‘Only travel if absolutely necessary’ to avoid putting ‘the emergency and care services under unnecessary extra pressure’.

It is still incumbent on motorists to adhere to government guidelines by avoiding unnecessary travel.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Government advice to just ‘Stay Alert’ is now, unfortunately, much less clear than ‘Stay at Home’.

Going into lockdown was far too slow. And now going ‘out’ is much too fast.

I’m sure I’m not alone in being thoroughly perplexed.

The pandemic is not over until it is over.

Related topics:

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.