Cuckfield homes on former school site approved

Plans to redevelop the former Court Meadow School site in Cuckfield have been approved.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

The school, in Hanlye Lane, closed in 2012 and was declared  surplus to requirements by West Sussex County Council.

An application to demolish the vacant buildings and build  13 homes  in their place was approved by Mid Sussex District Council’s planning committee on Thursday (April 14).

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Committee chairman Gary Marsh (Con, Ardingly and Balcombe) called it a ‘good use’ of a brownfield site and particularly welcomed the four new affordable homes due to be built.

Aerial impression of the proposed 13-home Cuckfield developmentAerial impression of the proposed 13-home Cuckfield development
Aerial impression of the proposed 13-home Cuckfield development

But Paul Brown (Green, High Weald) did raise concerns about how feasible and safe it would be for people to cycle to and from the site.

Roger Cartwright (LDem, BH – St Andrew’s) was impressed by the high standards of the proposed homes and felt they should be aiming for more homes to operate without gas boilers.

The boundary trees and vegetation on the northern boundary with Hanlye Lane and also that to the east are to be retained with extra planting and landscaping proposed within the site.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The site entrance off Hanlye Lane is to be widened to 5.5 metres. In addition to provide pedestrian connectivity from the site to the footpath along Hanlye Lane a pathway approximately 1.2 metres wide will be located between Plots 2 and 3.

Officers concluded in their report:  “The proposed design, layout and scale of the development is considered acceptable and would not cause harm to the character and appearance of the area.

“The proposal would not detract from the visual qualities and essential characteristics of the nearby High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. No significant harm would be caused to the amenities of the surrounding residential occupiers through overlooking, or a loss of outlook and the scheme would not cause harm in terms of parking or highway safety.”