Unpopular East Hoathly housing development approved

Highly controversial proposals for a housing development in East Hoathly have been given the go ahead by Wealden planners.
Development site location planDevelopment site location plan
Development site location plan

At a meeting on Thursday (July 16), Wealden District Council’s planning committee south approved outline proposals to build up to 205 homes on the Hesmonds Stud farm site off of Waldron Road, East Hoathly. 

The scheme had proven to be deeply unpopular with local residents, with a total of 931 objections submitted as part of the application process. 

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Some of these objections were highlighted at the meeting by ward councillor Geoffrey Draper (Con). He said: “The proposal to build 205 homes within this historic village of 381 homes existing – a 54 per cent increase – is a huge problem for this village. 

“The proposal is outside of the development area, it is within the conservation area and right outside of the development there are, not one, not two, not three, but four listed buildings. 

“Historic England and our own conservation officer in Wealden agree that significant harm will be caused by the development.

“We as officers of this planning committee south have a duty, a statutory duty to preserve listed building heritage assets and we have a duty to prevent any application development which will do otherwise. This will do otherwise.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Despite these arguments, the scheme had been recommended for approval by Wealden planning officers, largely due to the council’s lack of a five-year housing land supply. 

As the council cannot demonstrate a five-year land supply, national planning rules say sustainable developments should be granted unless the adverse impacts of doing so ‘significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits’.

Officers argued the damage to listed buildings would be ‘less than substantial’ and therefore weighed in the balance against the benefits of the scheme. 

Ultimately, officers concluded that the benefits – mostly in the form of housing supply – outweighed the adverse impacts. 

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

This argument saw opinions bitterly split on the committee, with some arguing that the balance did not fall in favour of development. 

Proposing the application be refused, Gavin Blake Coggins (Lib Dem, Hailsham East) said: “I am somewhat bemused because recently we had a planning application for 50-odd houses in East Hoathly and that was refused on the strength of the fact the village couldn’t cope with such a large influx of building.

“That being the case, why are we now looking at 200 houses? The same situation is current here. As Cllr Draper said, there are no facilities to support this type of development. It is far too huge for a very small village.

“This is a historic thing; the number of people who have written in with their views. They have to be taken into account, we can’t just shove 900 plus comments away.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Other committee members saw things differently, however, arguing that the scheme should be seen within the wider picture of Wealden’s housing need.

Johanna Howell (Con, Frant and Wadhurst) said: “These committees have got to make some very difficult decisions and I keep hearing from other councillors that we are going to have to ‘refuse this one and put it somewhere else’.

“Well, where? You don’t want them wherever they are. We have got to make some very, very difficult decisions.

“We do not have a five-year land supply. We have to have some control. If we don’t have any control we lose it and then we have no control over anything. 

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“As far as I can see, East Hoathly is as sustainable as any of our other villages in Wealden. Horam had no facilities and it has had thousands of houses. Frant has very few facilities and we’ve got hundreds of houses.

“We have got to make the grown-up decisions and we have got to face up to the grown-up decisions. None of us want this housing, but if we don’t do it, it will be done unto us.”

Following further debate the application was approved with seven votes in favour and three against. As ward member, Cllr Draper did not vote in line with the council’s usual convention.

As an outline application further planning permission is required before development could begin.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The application would also involve the demolition of existing stables buildings and a change of use for the land.

For further information see application reference WD/2016/2796/MAO on the Wealden District Council planning website.

A message from the Editor, Gary Shipton:

In order for us to continue to provide high quality and trusted local news, I am asking you to please purchase a copy of our newspapers.

With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our local valued advertisers - and consequently the advertising that we receive - we are more reliant than ever on you helping us to provide you with news and information by buying a copy of our newspapers.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Our journalists are highly trained and our content is independently regulated by IPSO to some of the most rigorous standards in the world. But being your eyes and ears comes at a price. So we need your support more than ever to buy our newspapers during this crisis.

Stay safe, and best wishes.

Related topics: