LETTER: Is the problem the passengers?

This article contains affiliate links. We may earn a small commission on items purchased through this article, but that does not affect our editorial judgement.

Reading between the lines of Terry Milford's letter extolling '˜the lost benefits' of the nationalised railway system (23/9/16), now available to us under Brexit, it appears the tub-thumping objective is purely ideological and will make little difference... trains will still be cancelled, delayed and diverted by strikes, engineering works, inclement weather and poor management. Commuters will still whinge!

Curiously, Terry asks ‘who in their right mind (would) hand regional monopolies to various private companies to run the trains?’, forgetting that is precisely how our once great railways were established and run (including the infrastructure) by private enterprise for 100 years; they merged to form four major, independent regional companies.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In those pre-nationalised years, privately owned rail, bus, internal airways groups and individual operators engaged in mutually beneficial agreements under the regulated Railway Road Transport Act (1928) and Road Traffic Act (1930). It was nationalisation, which created six autonomous regional operators, brought in decimation and endless tax-payer subsidies... and what happened to John Prescott’s mythical ‘Integrated Transport Policy’?

Competition in national monopolies was an EU requirement. Given the now privately run rail-freight operations run well, it begs the question, ‘is the real problem with the railways, the passengers in our over overcrowded London commuter belt’?

By all means run the (regulated) core infrastructure in the national interest – but do it on commercial lines (the government has owned many successful commercial businesses (BEA, Cable & Wireless, Channel 4...) in open competition.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Indeed today’s privately owned, non-profit making (ie: no dividends) Network Rail is to all intents and purposes a tightly regulated government monopoly rail infrastructure provider upon whom the frustrated private train operator ‘tenants’ are dependent for rail-tracks, stations, signals and timetable slots.

So, what difference would nationalisation actually make?

Barry M Jones

Bixley Lane

Beckley

Don’t miss out on all the latest breaking news where you live.

Here are four ways you can be sure you’ll be amongst the first to know what’s going on.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

1) Make our website your homepage at www.ryeandbattleobserver.co.uk/

2) Like our Facebook page at www.facebook.com/RyeandBattleObserver

3) Follow us on Twitter @RyeObs

4) Register with us by clicking on ‘sign in’ (top right corner). You can then receive our daily newsletter AND add your point of view to stories that you read here.

And do share with your family and friends - so they don’t miss out!

The Rye and Battle Observer - always the first with your local news.

Be part of it.