Chichester greenfield development approval ‘bewildering’

Letter from: Peter Lansley, Cedar Drive, Chichester
Whitehouse Farm housing site consultation exhibition at Chichester Baptist Church. 31-01-19 SUS-190102-111536001Whitehouse Farm housing site consultation exhibition at Chichester Baptist Church. 31-01-19 SUS-190102-111536001
Whitehouse Farm housing site consultation exhibition at Chichester Baptist Church. 31-01-19 SUS-190102-111536001

The Whitehouse Farm development – called the West of Chichester Strategic Development – is the largest by far of seven strategic developments that will total

4,230 homes as detailed in the Chichester Local Plan 2014-2029 including a primary school, ‘employment land’ of six hectares, a community hub with shops and community centre, and a country park.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The planning deadline for Chichester’s local plan to build more than 4,000 new houses with major changes to the A27 is July, 2020.

The government has refused to delay consideration of Chichester’s largest ever housing development project.

Chichester MP Gillian Keegan, the chief executive of Chichester District Council Diane Shepherd and other councillors, have all urged the Secretary of State for Housing, Robert Jenrick, to allow more time to consider this highly controversial plan, only to be told there was ‘no mechanism’ for individual authorities to have planning deadlines extended.

So there is no taking back local planning control.

The background paper in the local development plan states that the White House Farm Housing development ‘should not affect the potential or value of the wildlife corridor or compromise on environmental quality’ and to ensure ‘high standards of construction in accordance with the council’s declaration of a climate change emergency’.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

I am, therefore, bewildered that such a development should have received planning approval on such a significant greenfield site opposed by so many concerned residents reported in your newspaper, and demonstrating a complete disregard for the value wildlife and environmental quality in spite of our district council’s declaration of a climate change emergency.

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.