Peacehaven housing development approved

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now
Proposals for a small-scale housing development in Peacehaven have been approved by Lewes planners.

On Wednesday (September 7), Lewes District Council’s planning committee considered plans to build two four-bedroom houses and six two-bedroom bungalows on land either side of Downs Walk.

While recommended for approval, the scheme had seen significant objections from both local residents and Peacehaven Town Council, at least partly because it would be built on land outside Peacehaven’s development boundary. The town council argued it would be ‘premature’ to approve it as a result, because the land and development boundary are being considered as part of both the district council’s local plan process and its own neighbourhood plan.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

These concerns were shared in part by Cllr Laurence O’Connor (Lab), who said: “It is small-scale and it does reflect Downs Walk and the buildings that way, but I have to say I have grave concerns because it is outside the [planning] boundary. I know local people will think this is the thin end of the wedge and the whole of the valley will be developed.”

Downs Walk, PeacehavenDowns Walk, Peacehaven
Downs Walk, Peacehaven

Objectors had also raised concerns around the ecological impact of developing the site, which residents say was cleared of vegetation prior to the application and ecological assessment. In light of these concerns, officers recommended that an additional condition require a further such assessment if work did not begin within six months of the scheme being approved.

Ultimately, committee members felt there was little wrong with the proposal and approved the scheme on a majority vote.

Cllr Steve Saunders (Ind) said: “I like this development. I like the way the applicant has overcome environmental and renewable concerns that we might have had.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

He added: “It is on a greenfield site, effectively, and it is outside the planning boundary. It is sort of an infill site and looking at the remainder of the sites around you may argue it sets a bit of precedent and it’s a thin end of a wedge where we could have some more similar development. However, we have to look at what we’ve got here. For that reason — with all of the conditions that have been set by officers and any others we may want to add — I’m quite happy to propose approval of this particular application.”