Frustration at Grove Garden: remains of 80-foot tree still in Haywards Heath space for elderly people four months after Storm Eunice

The chairman of a garden for elderly people in Haywards Heath is frustrated that the remains of an 80-foot tree have not been removed after it came down four months ago.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

Nigel Ryan, a trustee of Grove Garden, said the tree was felled in February after it was seen ‘swaying dangerously’ following Storm Eunice.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“I don't think they could have left the vicinity with the tree in the state it was in,” said Nigel.

Grove Garden chairman and trustee Nigel Ryan with the felled tree in February 2022Grove Garden chairman and trustee Nigel Ryan with the felled tree in February 2022
Grove Garden chairman and trustee Nigel Ryan with the felled tree in February 2022

But he said the tree is now preventing the garden team from doing anything.

“It’s a hefty beast, so it’s still in the way,” said Nigel.

“We were due to open the garden up to the public at the beginning of June and start having fundraising events,” he added.

Read More
Burgess Hill Girls sixth-former Georgina Wrigg wins national LGBTQ+ award

Nigel said the team managed to chop some of the tree and trim branches but cannot move the remains without a professional.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“We actually got some quotes from a tree surgeon, I think it was about £2,500,” he said.

Nigel feels Grove Garden should not be responsible for removing the tree because they did not make the decision to fell it.

He said he would like Mims Davies and Jonathan Ash-Edwards to resolve the situation, possibly through Mid Sussex District Council.

Ms Davies said: “The right and urgent decision, due to the danger to life situation local residents found themselves in, was made to fell this beautiful but very dangerously unstable tree when storms raged earlier this year.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“Unfortunately the clear-up process has been somewhat delayed while suitable funds are sought to cover the costs and impact.

“The insurer of the property on whose land the tree stood, and which could have been significantly damaged with a high potential of personal injury had it been allowed to fall that way, have refused to pay on the basis that their client (who was unavailable at the time of this emergency) did not engage the tree surgeon.”

Ms Davies said a ‘suggested alternative’ to funding the repairs and removal had been shared with Grove Garden Trust, which could provide a workable solution.

The district council has been approached for comment.